Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Contribuciones de la distribución de la tierra al desarrollo de los países. Una revisión de la literatura

dc.contributor.authorAnaya Campo, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-15T20:53:20Z
dc.date.available2022-11-15T20:53:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-12
dc.date.submitted2020-03-06
dc.identifier.citationAnaya Campo, A. D. J. (2022). Contribuciones de la distribución de la tierra al desarrollo de los países. Una revisión de la literatura. Cuadernos de Economía, 41(86), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n86.85604spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/908
dc.description.abstractLa redistribución de la tierra favoreció el crecimiento económico de China, Corea del Sur, Japón y Taiwán. En estos países, la distribución, aunada al apoyo estatal, contribuyó en buena medida a la subsecuente industrialización de sus economías. La literatura reconoce el notable desarrollo del Este Asiático. Sin embargo, en otras naciones, especialmente de África y Latinoamérica, las reformas agrarias distributivas no evidencian resultados satisfactorios en materia de desarrollo. Este artículo revisa la literatura sobre las contribuciones de la distribución de la tierra al desarrollo de algunos países que padecieron o padecen alta concentración de tierra y problemas de pobreza.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceCuadernos de Economíaspa
dc.titleContribuciones de la distribución de la tierra al desarrollo de los países. Una revisión de la literaturaspa
dc.title.alternativeContributions of land distribution to the development of countries. A literature reviewspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAcemoglu, D. (2012). Los orígenes del poder, la prosperidad y la pobreza. Política Exterior, 47-54.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAlbertus, M. (2015). Autocracy and redistribution. Cambridge University Press.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAlbertus, M., & Kaplan, O. (2013). Land reform as a counterinsurgency policy. Evidence from Colombia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(2), 198-231.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAlbertus, M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., & Weingast, B. (2016). Authoritarian survival and poverty traps. Land reform in Mexico. World Development, 77(C), 154-170.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAllina-Pisano, J. (2004). Land reform and the social origins of private farmers in Russia and Ukraine. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 31(3-4), 489-514.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAznar, E. T. (2007). La cuestión agraria en John Stuart Mill. Areas: Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 26, 47-61.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBanco Mundial. (2020). https://databank.bancomundial.org/source/ world-development-indicatorsspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBenedict, J., Tria, K., & Mark, S. (1998). Agrarian transformations in China and Vietnam. The China Journal, 40, 37-58. https://doi. org/10.2307/2667453spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBesley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2010). Property rights and economic development. Handbook of Development Economics (vol. 5). Elsevier.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBishai, M. F. (1991). The development of industrial land in Taiwan. A legal framework for state control. The Journal of Developing Areas, 26(1), 53-64.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBorras, S. M., Franco, J., Gómez, S., Kay, C., & Spoor, M. (2012). Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 845-872.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBrandt, L., & Sands, B. (1990). Beyond Malthus and Ricardo: Economic growth, land concentration, and income distribution in early twentiethcentury rural China. The Journal of Economic History, 50(4), 807-827.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCEPAL. (2021). Panorama social de América Latina, 2020. Naciones Unidas.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCheng, C. (1983). Economic development in Taiwan and Mainland China: A comparison of strategies and performance. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 10(1), 60-86.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChikozho, C. (2016). The disjuncture between economic growth, poverty reduction and social inclusion in South Africa. En H. Musahara (ed.), Inclusive growth and development issues in Eastern and Southern Africa (pp. 109-138). OSSREA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCirillo, R. (1980). The ‘socialism’of Léon Walras and his economic thinking. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 39(3), 295-303.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationClement, F., & Amezaga, J. (2013). Conceptualising context in institutional reforms of land and natural resource management. The case of Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1), 140-163.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCliffe, L. (2000). Land reform in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 27(84), 273-286.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCostantino, A. (2016). The dark side of the boom: Land grabbing in dependent countries in the twenty-first century. International Critical Thought, 6(1), 79-100.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Janvry, A. (1981). The role of land reform in economic development. Policies and politics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(2), 384-392.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (1989). A study in resistance to institutional change. The lost game of Latin American land reform. World Development, 17(9), 1397-1407.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDeininger, K. (2009). Monitoring and evaluation of land policies and land reform. En H. Binswanger-Mkhize, C. Bourguignon & R. Van Den Brink. Agricultural land redistribution: Towards greater consensus (pp. 397- 439). World Bank.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDeininger, K., Jin, S., & Nagarajan, H. K. (2009). Land reforms, poverty reduction, and economic growth: Evidence from India. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(4), 496-521.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDing, C. (2003). Land policy reform in China: Assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 109-120.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEckstein, S. (1979). El capitalismo mundial y la revolución agraria en Bolivia. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 41(2), 457-478.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFAO. (2020a). https://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#dataspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFAO. (2020b). https://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/ world-census-of-agriculture/additional-international-comparison-tablesincluding- gini-coefficients/en/spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFernandes, B. M. (2009). The MST and agrarian reform in Brazil. Socialism and Democracy, 23(3), 90-99.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFlores, T. E. (2014). Vertical inequality, land reform, and insurgency in Colombia. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 20(1), 5-31.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFoldvary, F. E. (2008). The marginalists who confronted land. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(1), 89-117.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGalindo, J. (2019). Some aspects on the failure of agrarian reforms in Mexico and other Latin American countries. En Forum for Development Studies (vol. 46, pp. 131-146). Taylor & Francis.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHaggard, S. (2004). Institutions and growth in East Asia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 53-81.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHall, R. (2004). A political economy of land reform in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 31(100), 213-227.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHammond, J. L. (2009). Land occupations, violence, and the politics of agrarian reform in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 36(4), 156-177.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHanstad, T., Haque, T., & Nielsen, R. (2008). Improving land access for India’s rural poo. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(10), 49-56.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIscan, T. B. (2018). Redistributive land reform and structural change in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(3), 732-761.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJacoby, H. G., Li, G., & Rozelle, S. (2002). Hazards of expropriation: Tenure insecurity and investment in rural China. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1420-1447.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJakobsen, J., Rasmussen, K., Leisz, S., Folving, R., & Quang, N. (2007). The effects of land tenure policy on rural livelihoods and food sufficiency in the Upland Village of Que, North Central Vietnam. Agricultural Systems, 94(2), 309-319.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJeon, Y.-D., & Kim, Y.-Y. (2000). Land reform, income redistribution, and agricultural production in Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(2), 253-268.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKaushik, A., & Haque, T. (2005). Nature of land market interventions in India. Institute for Sustainable Development Noida.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKay, C. (1982). Achievements and contradictions of the Peruvian agrarian reform. The Journal of Development Studies, 18(2), 141-170.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKay, C., & Urioste, M. (2007). Bolivia’s unfinished agrarian reform: Rural poverty and development policies. En Land, poverty and livelihoods in an era of globalization (pp. 63-101). Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKnudsen, C., & Mertz, O. (2016). Improved land tenure not the driver of economic development in a Vietnamese community. Geografisk Tidsskrift- Danish Journal of Geography, 116(1), 82-84.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKung, J., & Liu, S. (1997). Farmers’ preferences regarding ownership and land tenure in post-Mao China. The China Journal, 38, 33-64.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLandreth, H., & Colander, D. C. (2006). Historia del pensamiento económico. McGraw-Hill.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLee, C. C., & Hsu, Y. C. (2009). Endogenous structural breaks, public investment in agriculture and agricultural land productivity in Taiwan. Applied Economics, 41(1), 87-103.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLi, L., McKinnell, K., & Walker, A. (2000). Convergence of the land tenure systems of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan? Journal of Property research, 17(4), 339-352.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLipton, M. (2009). Land reform in developing countries: Property rights and property wrongs. Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLiu, S. (2018). The structure of and changes to China’s land system. En R. Garnaut (ed.), China’s 40 years of reform and development: 1978-2018 (pp. 427-454). Australia National University.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLo, V. I., & Tian, X. (2002). Property rights, productivity gains and economic growth. The Chinese experience. Post-Communist Economies, 14(2), 245-258.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLumley, F. (1976). The Republic of China under Chiang Kai-shek: Taiwan today. Barrie and Jenkins.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMachado, A. (2017). El problema de la tierra: conflicto y desarrollo en Colombia. Debate.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMargulis, M. E., McKeon, N., & Borras, S. M. (2013). Land grabbing and global governance. Critical perspectives. Globalizations, 10(1), 1-23.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMason, T. D., & Swartzfager, J. (1989). Land reform and the rise of Sendero Luminoso in Peru. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1(4), 516-538.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMearns, R. (1999). Access to land in rural India. The World Bank.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMedearis, J. (2005). Labor, democracy, utility, and mill’s critique of private property. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 135-149.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMendola, M., & Simtowe, F. (2015). The welfare impact of land redistribution: Evidence from a quasi-experimental initiative in Malawi. World Development, 72, 53-69.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMinns, J. A. (2003). The labour movement in Taiwan. Labour History, 85, 103-128.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNewman, C., Tarp, F., & Van Den Broeck, K. (2015). Property rights and productivity: The case of joint land titling in Vietnam. Land Economics, 91(1), 91-105.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNovokmet, F., Piketty, T., & Zucman., G. (2018). From soviets to oligarchs. Inequality and property in Russia 1905-2016. Journal of Economic Inequality, 16(2), 189-223.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNtsebeza, L., & Hall, R. (2007). The land question in South Africa: The challenge of transformation and redistribution. HSRC press.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPallot, J., & Nefedova, T. (2003). Geographical differentiation in household plot production in rural Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 44(1), 40-64.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPark, A., & Johnston, B. (1995). Rural development and dynamic externalities in Taiwan’s structural transformation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(1), 181-208.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParker, G., & Amati, M. (2009). Institutional setting, politics and planning: Private property, public interest and land reform in Japan. International Planning Studies, 14(2), 141-160.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPham, M. C. (2005). Land-Use change in the northwestern uplands of Vietnam. Empirical evidence from spatial econometric models and georeferenced analyses and policy implications for sustainable rural development. Cuvillier Verlag.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPhuc, T. X., & Nghi, T. H. (2014). Forest land allocation in the context of forestry sector restructuring: Opportunities for forestry development and upland livelihood improvement. Tropenbos International Viet Nam.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPlatteau, J. P. (1983). Classical economics and agrarian reforms in underdeveloped areas: The radical views of the two mills. Journal of Development Studies, 19(4), 435-460.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPNUD. (2019). Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2019. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRay, S. (1996). Land system and its reforms in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 220-237.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRuhiiga, T. (2011). Land reform and rural poverty in South Africa. Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 29-38.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSandewall, M., Ohlsson, B., Sandewall, R. K., & Viet, L. S. (2010). The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam. Ambio, 39(8), 567-579.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSauer, S., & Pereira-Leite, S. (2012). Agrarian structure, foreign investment in land, and land prices in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 873-898.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShin, G.-W. (1998). Agrarian conflict and the origins of Korean capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1309-1351.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSorensen, A. (2010). Land, property rights, and planning in japan. Institutional design and institutional change in land management. Planning Perspectives, 25(3), 279-302.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStiglitz, J. (1997). The role of government in economic development. En B. Pleskovic & J. Stiglitz (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (pp. 11-23). World Bank.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThuan, D. (2005). Forestry, poverty reduction and rural livelihoods in Vietnam. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUrioste, M. (2012). Concentration and “foreignisation” of land in Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne détudes du développement, 33(4), 439-457.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWegren, S. K. (1998). The conduct and impact of land reform in Russia. En S. Wegren (ed.). Land reform in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe (pp. 3-34). Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWegren, S. K. (2008). Land reform in Russia: What went wrong? Post- Soviet Affairs, 24(2), 121-147.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWorld Bank. (2005). World development Report 2006. Equity and Development (World Development Report). The World Bank Group.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWorld Bank. (2007). India Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Oxford University.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYou, J.-S. (2017). Demystifying the Park Chung-Hee Myth: Land reform in the evolution of Korea's developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(4), 535-556.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZhang, Y., Wang, X., Glauben, T., & Brümmer, B. (2011). The impact of land reallocation on technical efficiency: Evidence from China. Agricultural Economics, 42(4), 495-507.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZhou, Y., Shi, X., Heerink, N., & Ma, X. (2019). The effect of land tenure governance on technical efficiency: Evidence from three provinces in eastern China. Applied Economics, 51(22), 2337-2354.spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.audiencePúblico generalspa
dc.identifier.doi10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n86.85604
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad del Atlánticospa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad del Atlánticospa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132579625&doi=10.15446%2fcuad.econ.v41n86.85604&origin=inward&txGid=4d2cac16018bd05ebcd2026dd140838c
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.subject.keywordsdesarrollo económicospa
dc.subject.keywordsdistribución de la tierraspa
dc.subject.keywordstenencia de la tierraspa
dc.subject.keywordsreforma agrariaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.spaArtículospa
dc.publisher.placeBarranquillaspa
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.sedeSede Nortespa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
85604-Texto del artículo-57507 ...
Tamaño:
552.9Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
914bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ATLÁNTICO

Institución Pública de Educación Superior | Sujeta a la inspección y vigilancia del Ministerio de Educación Nacional | Nit. 890102257-3
Sede Norte: Carrera 30 Número 8- 49 Puerto Colombia - Atlántico | Sede Centro: Carrera 43 Número 50 - 53 Barranquilla- Atlántico.
Bellas Artes- Museo de Antropología: Calle 68 Número 53- 45 Barranquilla- Atlántico | Sede Regional Sur: Calle 7 No. 23-5 Barrio Abajo Suan- Atlántico
Línea de atención: PBX: (57) (5) 3852266 | Atlántico- Colombia | © Universidad del Atlántico
#UniversidadDeTodos

Resolución de lineamientos del repositorio - Estatuto de propiedad intelectual - Formato para trabajos de grado - Politicas Repositorio Institucional

Tecnología DSpace implementada por