Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Acrylic Bone Cements Modified with Graphene Oxide: Mechanical, Physical, and Antibacterial Properties

dc.contributor.authorValencia Zapata, Mayra Eliana
dc.contributor.otherRuiz Rojas, Lina Marcela
dc.contributor.otherMina Hernández, José Herminsul
dc.contributor.otherDelgado-Ospina, Johannes
dc.contributor.otherGrande Tovar, Carlos David
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-15T19:44:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-15T19:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-07
dc.date.submitted2020-07-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/849
dc.description.abstractBacterial infections are a common complication after total joint replacements (TJRs), the treatment of which is usually based on the application of antibiotic-loaded cements; however, owing to the increase in antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, the possibility of studying new antibacterial agents in acrylic bone cements (ABCs) is open. In this study, the antibacterial effect of formulations of ABCs loaded with graphene oxide (GO) between 0 and 0.5 wt.% was evaluated against Gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus, and Gram-negative ones: Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli. It was found that the effect of GO was dependent on the concentration and type of bacteria: GO loadings ≥0.2 wt.% presented total inhibition of Gram-negative bacteria, while GO loadings ≥0.3 wt.% was necessary to achieve the same effect with Gram-positives bacteria. Additionally, the evaluation of some physical and mechanical properties showed that the presence of GO in cement formulations increased wettability by 17%, reduced maximum temperature during polymerization by 19%, increased setting time by 40%, and increased compressive and flexural mechanical properties by up to 17%, all of which are desirable behaviors in ABCs. The formulation of ABC loading with 0.3 wt.% GO showed great potential for use as a bone cement with antibacterial properties.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourcePolymersspa
dc.titleAcrylic Bone Cements Modified with Graphene Oxide: Mechanical, Physical, and Antibacterial Propertiesspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation1. Eil Bakhtiari, S.S.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Karbasi, S.; Tavakoli, M.; Razzaghi, M.; Fauzi Ismail, A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Berto, F. Polymethyl Methacrylate-Based Bone Cements Containing Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Oxide: An Overview of Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 1469.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation2. Tavakoli, M.; Bakhtiari, S.S.E.; Karbasi, S. Incorporation of chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite in to the PMMA bone cement: Physical, mechanical and biological evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 783–793spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation3. Vazquez-Lasa, B. Poly(methylmethacrylate) Bone Cement: Chemical Composition and Chemistry. In Orthopaedic Bone Cements; Deb, S., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2008.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation4. Dunne, N.J.; Orr, J.F.; Road, S.; Ireland, N. Curing characteristics of acrylic bone cement. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2002, 13, 17–22.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation5. Shen, S.-C.; Ng, W.K.; Dong, Y.-C.; Ng, J.; Tan, R.B.H. Nanostructured material formulated acrylic bone cements with enhanced drug release. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 58, 233–241spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation6. Magnan, B.; Bondi, M.; Maluta, T.; Samaila, E.; Schirru, L.; Dall’Oca, C. Acrylic bone cement: Current concept review. Musculoskelet. Surg. 2013, 97, 93–100spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation7. Maleki Dizaj, S.; Mennati, A.; Jafari, S.; Khezri, K.; Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of carbon-based nanoparticles. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 5, 19–23.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation8. Lu, N.; Li, Z. Chapter 5. Graphene Oxide: Theoretical Perspectives. In Quantum Simulations of Materials and Biological Systems; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 69–84.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation9. Hu, W.; Peng, C.; Luo, W.; Lv, M.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Huang, Q.; Fan, C. Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4317–4323.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation10. Mukherjee, S.P.; Gliga, A.R.; Lazzaretto, B.; Brandner, B.; Fielden, M.; Vogt, C.; Newman, L.; Rodrigues, A.F.; Shao, W.; Fournier, P.M.; et al. Graphene oxide is degraded by neutrophils and the degradation products are non-genotoxic. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 1180–1188.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation11. Girish, C.M.; Sasidharan, A.; Gowd, G.S.; Nair, S.; Koyakutty, M. Confocal raman imaging study showing macrophage mediated biodegradation of graphene in vivo. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2013, 2, 1489–1500spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation12. Palmieri, V.; Papi, M.; Conti, C.; Ciasca, G.; Maulucci, G.; De Spirito, M.; Palmieri, V.; Papi, M.; Conti, C.; Ciasca, G.; et al. The future development of bacteria fighting medical devices: The role of graphene oxide The future development of bacteria fighting medical devices: The role of graphene oxide. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2016, 13, 1013–1019spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation13. Khan, A.A.; Mirza, E.H.; Mohamed, B.A.; El-Sharawy, M.A.; Hasil Al-Asmari, M.; Abdullah Al-Khureif, A.; Ahmad Dar, M.; Vallittu, P.K. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of graphene oxide-based bone cementing agents. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 2297–2304.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation14. Khan, A.A.; Mirza, E.H.; Mohamed, B.A.; Alharthi, N.H.; Abdo, H.S.; Javed, R.; Alhur, R.S.; Vallittu, P.K. Physical, mechanical, chemical and thermal properties of nanoscale graphene oxide-poly methylmethacrylate composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 52, 2803–2813spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation15. Paz, E.; Forriol, F.; del Real, J.C.; Dunne, N. Graphene oxide versus graphene for optimisation of PMMA bone cement for orthopaedic applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 1003–1011spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation16. Valencia Zapata, M.E.; Mina Hernandez, J.H.; Grande Tovar, C.D.; Valencia Llano, C.H.; Diaz Escobar, J.A.; Vazquez-Lasa, B.; San Roman, J.; Rojo, L. Novel Bioactive and Antibacterial Acrylic Bone Cement Nanocomposites Modified with Graphene Oxide and Chitosan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2938spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation17. Paz, E.; Ballesteros, Y.; Abenojar, J.; Del Real, J.C.; Dunne, N.J. Graphene Oxide and Graphene Reinforced PMMA Bone Cements: Evaluation of Thermal Properties and Biocompatibility. Mol. Divers. Preserv. Int. 2019, 12, 3146spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation18. Mirza, E.H.; Khan, A.A.; Al-Khureif, A.A.; Saadaldin, S.A.; Mohamed, B.A.; Fareedi, F.; Khan, M.M.; Alfayez, M.; Al-Fotawi, R.; Vallittu, P.K.; et al. Characterization of osteogenic cells grown over modified grapheneoxide-biostable polymers. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 14, 065004spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation19. Gonçalves, G.; Portolés, M.-T.; Ramírez-Santillán, C.; Vallet-Regí, M.; Serro, A.P.; Grácio, J.; Marques, P.A.A.P. Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of PMMA/high-load HA/carbon nanostructures bone cement formulations. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2013, 24, 2787–2796spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation20. Paz, E.; Ballesteros, Y.; Forriol, F.; Dunne, N.J.; del Real, J.C. Graphene and graphene oxide functionalisation with silanes for advanced dispersion and reinforcement of PMMA-based bone cements. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109946spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation21. International Standard ISO 5833: Implants for Surgery-Acrylic Resin Cements; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002; pp. 1–22spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation22. Muniyalakshmi, M.; Sethuraman, K.; Silambarasan, D. Materials Today: Proceedings Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide nanosheets. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 408–410spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation23. Kumar, R.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R. Surface modification of Graphene Oxide using Esterification. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 1556–1561spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation24. Torrisi, L.; Cutroneo, M.; Havranek, V.; Silipigni, L.; Fazio, B.; Fazio, M.; Marco, G.D.; Stassi, A.; Torrisi, A. Self-supporting graphene oxide films preparation and characterization methods. Vacuum 2019, 160, 1–11.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation25. Sharma, R.; Kapusetti, G.; Bhong, S.Y.; Roy, P.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, S.; Balavigneswaran, C.K.; Mahato, K.K.; Ray, B.; Maiti, P.; et al. Osteoconductive Amine-Functionalized Graphene-Poly(methyl methacrylate) Bone Cement Composite with Controlled Exothermic Polymerization. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 2254–2265spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation26. Gonçalves, G.; Cruz, S.M.A.; Ramalho, A.; Grácio, J.; Marques, P.A.A.P. Graphene oxide versus functionalized carbon nanotubes as a reinforcing agent in a PMMA/HA bone cement. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 2937–2945spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation27. Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5731–5736.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation28. Perreault, F.; Fonseca de Faria, A.; Nejati, S.; Elimelech, M. Antimicrobial Properties of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets: Why Size Matters. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7226–7236spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation29. Gurunathan, S.; Han, J.W.; Abdal Dayem, A.; Eppakayala, V.; Kim, J.H. Oxidative stress-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5901–5914spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation30. Velasco-Soto, M.A.; Pérez-García, S.A.; Alvarez-Quintana, J.; Cao, Y.; Nyborg, L.; Licea-Jiménez, L. Selective band gap manipulation of graphene oxide by its reduction with mild reagents. Carbon N. Y. 2015, 93, 967–973spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation31. Gamze, Z.; Do ˘gan, M. Characterization and thermal kinetic analysis of PMMA/modified-MWCNT nanocomposites. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 108, 107950.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation32. Angelopoulou, A.; Efthimiadou, E.K.; Boukos, N.; Kordas, G. A new approach for the one-step synthesis of bioactive PS vs. PMMA silica hybrid microspheres as potential drug delivery systems. Colloid Surf. B 2014, 117, 322–329spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation33. Alves, F.; Brena, S.; Fontele, C.; Karine, L.; Santos, B.; Alves, L.; Marcelo, J.; Castro, D.; Carlos, J.; Gonçalves, R.; et al. Synthesis, characterization of α -terpineol-loaded PMMA nanoparticles as proposed of therapy for melanoma. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100762spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation34. Valencia Zapata, M.E.; Mina Hernandez, J.H.; Grande Tovar, C.D. Acrylic Bone Cement Incorporated with Low Chitosan Loadings. Polymers (Basel) 2020, 12, 1617.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation35. Tadano, T.; Zhu, R.; Suzuki, S.; Hoshi, T.; Sasaki, D.; Hagiwara, T.; Sawaguchi, T. Thermal degradation of transparent poly (methyl methacrylate)/silica nanoparticle hybrid fi lms. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 109, 7–12spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation36. Xiong, S.Y.; Xu, Y.M.; Jiao, Y.H.; Wang, L.; Li, M.Z. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Wild Silkworms and Bombyx Mori Silk Fibroin Films. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 197–198, 27–31.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation37. Kieswetter, K.; Schwartz, Z.; Hummert, T.W.; Cochran, D.L.; Simpson, J.; Dean, D.D.; Boyan, B.D. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1996, 32, 55–63.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation38. Lampin, M.; Legris, C.; Degrange, M.; Sigot-Luizard, M.F.; Warocquier-Clerout, R.; Legris, C.; Degrange, M.; Sigot-Luizard, M.F. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 99–108spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation39. Shen, J.; Shi, M.; Ma, H.; Yan, B.; Li, N.; Hu, Y.; Ye, M. Synthesis of hydrophilic and organophilic chemically modified graphene oxide sheets. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 366–370spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation40. Sugita, Y.; Okubo, T.; Saita, M.; Ishijima, M.; Rezaei, N.M.; Taniyama, T.; Sato, N.; Saruta, J.; Maeda, H.; Ogawa, T. Novel Osteogenic Behaviors around Hydrophilic and Radical-Free 4-META/MMA-TBB: Implications of an Osseointegrating Bone Cement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2405.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation41. Yoshinari, M.; Wei, J.; Matsuzaka, K.; Inoue, T. Effect of cold plasma-surface modification on surface wettability and initial cell attachment. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2009, 58, 171–175.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation42. Chen, S.; Li, L.; Zhao, C.; Zheng, J. Surface hydration: Principles and applications toward low-fouling/non-fouling biomaterials. Polymer (Guildf) 2010, 51, 5283–5293spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation43. Lee, J.-H.; Jo, J.-K.; Kim, D.-A.; Dev, K.; Kim, H.-W.; Lee, H. Nano-graphene oxide incorporated into PMMA resin to prevent microbial adhesion. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 63–72spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation44. Ormsby, R.W.; Modreanu, M.; Mitchell, C.A.; Dunne, N.J. Carboxyl functionalised MWCNT/polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for orthopaedic applications. J. Biomater. Appl. 2014, 29, 209–221spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation45. Boner, V.; Kuhn, P.; Mendel, T.; Gisep, A. Temperature Evaluation During PMMA Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Bone-An In Vitro Study About the Risk of Thermal Necrosis in Human Femoral Heads. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2009, 90B, 842–848spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation46. Verlaan, J.; Oner, F.C.; Verbout, A.J.; Dhert, W.J.A. Temperature Elevation after Vertebroplasty with PolymethylMethacrylate in the Goat Spine. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2003, 67B, 581–585.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation47. Golz, T.; Graham, C.R.; Busch, L.C.; Wulf, J.; Winder, R.J. Temperature elevation during simulated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty in a cadaver model. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2010, 17, 617–622spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation48. Pina, S.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Brushite-Forming Mg-, Zn-and Sr-Substituted Bone Cements for Clinical Applications. Materials (Basel) 2010, 3, 519–535spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation49. Baroud, G.; Samara, M.; Steffen, T. Influence of Mixing Method on the Cement Temperature-Mixing Time History and Doughing Time of Three Acrylic Cements for Vertebroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2003, 68B, 112–116spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation50. Yeon, S.; Hyun, S. Setting properties, mechanical strength and in vivo evaluation of calcium phosphate-based bone cements. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 128–136.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation51. Schröder, C.; Nguyen, M.; Kraxenberger, M.; Chevalier, Y.; Melcher, C.; Wegener, B.; Birkenmaier, C. Modification of PMMA vertebroplasty cement for reduced stiffness by addition of normal saline: A material properties evaluation. Eur. Spine J. 2017, 26, 3209–3215spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation52. Ormsby, R.; McNally, T.; O’Hare, P.; Burke, G.; Mitchell, C.; Dunne, N. Fatigue and biocompatibility properties of a poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1201–1212spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation53. Ruiz, S.; Tamayo, J.A.; Ospina, J.D.; Navia Porras, D.P.; Valencia Zapata, M.E.; Mina Hernandez, J.H.; Valencia, C.H.; Zuluaga, F.; Grande Tovar, C.D. Antimicrobial Films Based on Nanocomposites of Chitosan /Poly (vinyl alcohol) /Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 109spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation54. Du, J.; Wang, S.; You, H.; Zhao, X. Understanding the toxicity of carbon nanotubes in the environment is crucial to the control of nanomaterials in producing and processing and the assessment of health risk for human: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 36, 451–462.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation55. Kassem, A.; Ayoub, G.M.; Malaeb, L. Antibacterial activity of chitosan nanocomposites and carbon nanotubes: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 668, 566–576spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation56. Liu, S.; Zeng, T.H.; Hofmann, M.; Burcombe, E.; Wei, J.; Jiang, R.; Kong, J.; Chen, Y. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6971–6980.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitation57. Fan, J.; Grande, C.D.; Rodrigues, D.F. Biodegradation of graphene oxide-polymer nanocomposite films in wastewater. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 1808–1816spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.audiencePúblico generalspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym12081773
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad del Atlánticospa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad del Atlánticospa
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.subject.keywordsacrylic bone cement; antibacterial activity; graphene oxide; mechanical properties; physical propertiesspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.spaArtículospa
dc.publisher.placeBarranquillaspa
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.sedeSede Nortespa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
polymers-12-01773.pdf
Tamaño:
4.271Mb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
914bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ATLÁNTICO

Institución Pública de Educación Superior | Sujeta a la inspección y vigilancia del Ministerio de Educación Nacional | Nit. 890102257-3
Sede Norte: Carrera 30 Número 8- 49 Puerto Colombia - Atlántico | Sede Centro: Carrera 43 Número 50 - 53 Barranquilla- Atlántico.
Bellas Artes- Museo de Antropología: Calle 68 Número 53- 45 Barranquilla- Atlántico | Sede Regional Sur: Calle 7 No. 23-5 Barrio Abajo Suan- Atlántico
Línea de atención: PBX: (57) (5) 3852266 | Atlántico- Colombia | © Universidad del Atlántico
#UniversidadDeTodos

Resolución de lineamientos del repositorio - Estatuto de propiedad intelectual - Formato para trabajos de grado - Politicas Repositorio Institucional

Tecnología DSpace implementada por