Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Histological Evaluation of Cassava Starch/Chicken Gelatin Membranes

dc.contributor.authorValencia Llano, Carlos Humberto
dc.contributor.otherCastro, Jorge Iván
dc.contributor.otherSaavedra, Marcela
dc.contributor.otherZapata, Paula A.
dc.contributor.otherNavia Porras, Diana Paola
dc.contributor.otherFlórez López, Edwin
dc.contributor.otherCaicedo, Carolina
dc.contributor.otherCalambas, Heidy Lorena
dc.contributor.otherGrande Tovar, Carlos David
dc.coverage.spatialColombia
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T21:44:46Z
dc.date.available2022-11-14T21:44:46Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-14
dc.date.submitted2022-08-17
dc.identifier.citationValencia-Llano, C.H.; Castro, J.I.; Saavedra, M.; Zapata, P.A.; Navia-Porras, D.P.; Flórez-López, E.; Caicedo, C.; Calambas, H.L.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. Histological Evaluation of Cassava Starch/Chicken Gelatin Membranes. Polymers 2022, 14, 3849. https:// doi.org/10.3390/polym14183849spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12834/759
dc.description.abstractThe use of biopolymers for tissue engineering has recently gained attention due to the need for safer and highly compatible materials. Starch is one of the most used biopolymers for membrane preparation. However, incorporating other polymers into starch membranes introduces improvements, such as better thermal and mechanical resistance and increased water affinity, as we reported in our previous work. There are few reports in the literature on the biocompatibility of starch/chicken gelatin composites. We assessed the in vivo biocompatibility of the five composites (T1–T5) cassava starch/gelatin membranes with subdermal implantations in biomodels at 30, 60, and 90 days. The FT-IR spectroscopy analysis demonstrated the main functional groups for starch and chicken gelatin. At the same time, the thermal study exhibited an increase in thermal resistance for T3 and T4, with a remaining mass (~15 wt.%) at 800 C. The microstructure analysis for the T2–T4 demonstrated evident roughness changes with porosity presence due to starch and gelatin mixture. The decrease in the starch content in the composites also decreased the gelatinization heats for T3 and T4 (195.67, 196.40 J/g, respectively). Finally, the implantation results demonstrated that the formulations exhibited differences in the degradation and resorption capacities according to the starch content, which is easily degraded by amylases. However, the histological results showed that the samples demonstrated almost complete reabsorption without a severe immune response, indicating a high in vivo biocompatibility. These results show that the cassava starch/chicken gelatin composites are promising membrane materials for tissue engineering applications.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourcePolymersspa
dc.titleHistological Evaluation of Cassava Starch/Chicken Gelatin Membranesspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUmesh, M.; Shanmugam, S.; Kikas, T.; Lan Chi, N.T.; Pugazhendhi, A. Progress in Bio-Based Biodegradable Polymer as the Effective Replacement for the Engineering Applicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132267. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOsorio, L.L.; Flórez-López, E.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. The Potential of Selected Agri-Food Loss and Waste to Contribute to a Circular Economy: Applications in the Food, Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Industries. Molecules 2021, 26, 515. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSofi, H.S.; Ashraf, R.; Beigh, M.A.; Sheikh, F.A. Scaffolds Fabricated from Natural Polymers/Composites by Electrospinning for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1078, 49–78. [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOsmani, R.A.M.; Singh, E.; Jadhav, K.; Jadhav, S.; Banerjee, R. 23—Biopolymers and Biocomposites: Nature’s Tools forWound Healing and Tissue Engineering. In Applications of Advanced Green Materials; Ahmed, S., Ed.;Woodhead Publishing in Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Duxford, UK, 2021; pp. 573–630. ISBN 978-0-12-820484-9.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPandit, A.; Kumar, R. A Review on Production, Characterization and Application of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Biocomposites. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2738–2755. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFormela, K.; Hejna, A.; Piszczyk, Ł.; Saeb, M.R.; Colom, X. Processing and Structure–Property Relationships of Natural Rubber/Wheat Bran Biocomposites. Cellulose 2016, 23, 3157–3175. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHejna, A.; Sulyman, M.; Przybysz, M.; Saeb, M.R.; Klein, M.; Formela, K. On the Correlation of Lignocellulosic Filler Composition with the Performance Properties of Poly ("-Caprolactone) Based Biocomposites. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2020, 11, 1467–1479. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBilal, M.; Rasheed, T.; Nabeel, F.; Iqbal, H. Bionanocomposites from Biofibers and Biopolymers. In Biofibers and Biopolymers for Biocomposites; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 135–157.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJouyandeh, M.; Vahabi, H.; Rabiee, N.; Rabiee, M.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Saeb, M.R. Green Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 603–620. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZarski, A.; Bajer, K.; Kapu´sniak, J. Review of the Most Important Methods of Improving the Processing Properties of Starch toward Non-Food Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 832. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHanashiro, I. Fine Structure of Amylose. In Starch; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 41–60.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKong, X. Fine Structure of Amylose and Amylopectin. In Starch Structure, Functionality and Application in Foods; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 29–39.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVieira, M.G.A.; da Silva, M.A.; dos Santos, L.O.; Beppu, M.M. Natural-Based Plasticizers and Biopolymer Films: A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47, 254–263. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSarder, R.; Piner, E.; Rios, D.C.; Chacon, L.; Artner, M.A.; Barrios, N.; Argyropoulos, D. Copolymers of Starch, a Sustainable Template for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118973. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationQuintanilla de Stéfano, J.C.; Abundis-Correa, V.; Herrera-Flores, S.D.; Alvarez, A.J. PH-Sensitive Starch-Based Hydrogels: Synthesis and Effect of Molecular Components on Drug Release Behavior. Polymers 2020, 12, 1974. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationXu, Y.; Zi, Y.; Lei, J.; Mo, X.; Shao, Z.;Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, D.; Mu, C. PH-Responsive Nanoparticles Based on Cholesterol/Imidazole Modified Oxidized-Starch for Targeted Anticancer Drug Delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 233, 115858. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGuo, L.; Liang, Z.; Yang, L.; Du,W.; Yu, T.; Tang, H.; Li, C.; Qiu, H. The Role of Natural Polymers in Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Control. Release 2021, 338, 571–582. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAbd El-Ghany, N.A.; Aziz, M.S.A.; Abdel-Aziz, M.M.; Mahmoud, Z. Antimicrobial and Swelling Behaviors of Novel Biodegradable Corn Starch Grafted/Poly (4-Acrylamidobenzoic Acid) Copolymers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 912–920. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHuang, Z.-F.; Zhang, X.-Q.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Yang, B.;Wang, K.;Wang, S.-Q.; Yuan, J.-Y.; Tao, L.;Wei, Y. Synthesis of Starch-Based Amphiphilic Fluorescent Nanoparticles and Their Application in Biological Imaging. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 2345–2351. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShahriarpanah, S.; Nourmohammadi, J.; Amoabediny, G. Fabrication and Characterization of Carboxylated Starch-Chitosan Bioactive Scaffold for Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 1069–1078. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLeonor, I.B.; Rodrigues, M.T.; Gomes, M.E.; Reis, R.L. In Situ Functionalization of Wet-spun Fibre Meshes for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 5, 104–111. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLiu, D.; Nikoo, M.; Boran, G.; Zhou, P.; Regenstein, J.M. Collagen and Gelatin. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 527–557. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLv, L.-C.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Ding, W.; Xiao, X.-H.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Xiong, L.-X. Fish Gelatin: The Novel Potential Applications. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 63, 103581. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBaziwane, D.; He, Q. Gelatin: The Paramount Food Additive. Food Rev. Int. 2003, 19, 423–435. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDjagny, K.B.; Wang, Z.; Xu, S. Gelatin: A Valuable Protein for Food and Pharmaceutical Industries. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001, 41, 481–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDeng, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Wei, S. In Situ Synthesis and in Vitro Biocompatibility of Needle-like Nano-Hydroxyapatite in Agar–Gelatin Co-Hydrogel. Mater. Lett. 2013, 104, 8–12. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWang, C.-Y.; Kuo, Z.-K.; Hsieh, M.-K.; Ke, L.-Y.; Chen, C.-C.; Cheng, C.-M.; Lai, P.-L. Cell Migration of Preosteoblast Cells on a Clinical Gelatin Sponge for 3D Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 15, 15005. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWang, H.; Boerman, O.C.; Sariibrahimoglu, K.; Li, Y.; Jansen, J.A.; Leeuwenburgh, S.C.G. Comparison of Micro-vs. Nanostructured Colloidal Gelatin Gels for Sustained Delivery of Osteogenic Proteins: Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Alkaline Phosphatase. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 8695–8703. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Nieuwenhove, I.; Salamon, A.; Adam, S.; Dubruel, P.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Peters, K. Gelatin- and Starch-Based Hydrogels. Part B: In Vitro Mesenchymal Stem Cell Behavior on the Hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 161, 295–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBombin, A.D.J.; Dunne, N.J.; McCarthy, H.O. Electrospinning of Natural Polymers for the Production of Nanofibres for Wound Healing Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 114, 110994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYe, S.; Jiang, L.; Su, C.; Zhu, Z.;Wen, Y.; Shao,W. Development of Gelatin/Bacterial Cellulose Composite Sponges as Potential Natural Wound Dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 148–155. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationde Paula de Lima Lima, T.; Passos, M.F. Skin Wounds, the Healing Process, and Hydrogel-Based Wound Dressings: A Short Review. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2021, 32, 1910–1925. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSakthiguru, N.; Sithique, M.A. Fabrication of Bioinspired Chitosan/Gelatin/Allantoin Biocomposite Film forWound Dressing Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 873–883. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAdeli, H.; Khorasani, M.T.; Parvazinia, M. Wound Dressing Based on Electrospun PVA/Chitosan/Starch Nanofibrous Mats: Fabrication, Antibacterial and Cytocompatibility Evaluation and in Vitro Healing Assay. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 238–254. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZoran, L.; Marija, B.; Radomir, M.; Stevo, M.; Marko, M.; Igor, D. Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin. Acta Vet. Brno. 2014, 64, 477–492. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCastro, J.I.; Navia-Porras, D.P.; Arbeláez Cortés, J.A.; Mina Hernández, J.H.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. Synthesis, Characterization, and Optimization Studies of Starch/Chicken Gelatin Composites for Food-Packaging Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 2264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPodshivalov, A.; Zakharova, M.; Glazacheva, E.; Uspenskaya, M. Gelatin/Potato Starch Edible Biocomposite Films: Correlation between Morphology and Physical Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1162–1172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBiswal, D.R.; Singh, R.P. Characterisation of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Polyacrylamide Graft Copolymer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 57, 379–387. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTongdeesoontorn,W.; Mauer, L.J.;Wongruong, S.; Sriburi, P.; Rachtanapun, P. Effect of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Concentration on Physical Properties of Biodegradable Cassava Starch-Based Films. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 6. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHanani, Z.N.; Roos, Y.; Kerry, J. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopic Analysis of Biodegradable Gelatin Films Immersed in Water. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Engineering and Food, ICEF11, Athens, Greece, 22–26 May 2011.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAhmadi, A.; Ahmadi, P.; Ehsani, A. Development of an Active Packaging System Containing Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for the Extension of Chicken Fillet Shelf Life. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 5461–5473. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBertoft, E. Understanding Starch Structure: Recent Progress. Agronomy 2017, 7, 56. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWalker, M. Investigating the Colloidal Properties of Drum-Dried Wheat Starches in Low-Fat Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Master’s Thesis, The University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2021.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSchick, C. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) of Semicrystalline Polymers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 1589–1611. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJenkins, P.J.; Donald, A.M. Gelatinisation of Starch: A Combined SAXS/WAXS/DSC and SANS Study. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 308, 133–147. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFuentes, C.; Kang, I.; Lee, J.; Song, D.; Sjöö, M.; Choi, J.; Lee, S.; Nilsson, L. Fractionation and Characterization of Starch Granules Using Field-Flow Fractionation (FFF) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 3665–3674. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAndrade, M.M.P.; De Oliveira, C.S.; Colman, T.A.D.; Da Costa, F.J.O.G.; Schnitzler, E. Effects of Heat-Moisture Treatment on Organic Cassava Starch: Thermal, Rheological and Structural Study. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 115, 2115–2122. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCooke, D.; Gidley, M.J. Loss of Crystalline and Molecular Order during Starch Gelatinisation: Origin of the Enthalpic Transition. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 227, 103–112. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWang, L.Z.; Liu, L.; Holmes, J.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Assessment of Film-forming Potential and Properties of Protein and Polysaccharide-based Biopolymer Films. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 1128–1138. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLoo, C.P.Y.; Sarbon, N.M. Chicken Skin Gelatin Films with Tapioca Starch. Food Biosci. 2020, 35, 100589. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMendes, J.F.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Carmona, V.B.; Neto, A.R.S.; Marques, A.C.P.; Marconcini, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Medeiros, E.S.; Oliveira, J.E. Biodegradable Polymer Blends Based on Corn Starch and Thermoplastic Chitosan Processed by Extrusion. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 452–458. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMoreno, O.; Díaz, R.; Atarés, L.; Chiralt, A. Influence of the Processing Method and Antimicrobial Agents on Properties of Starch-gelatin Biodegradable Films. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 905–914. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTongdeesoontorn,W.; Mauer, L.J.;Wongruong, S.; Sriburi, P.; Rachtanapun, P. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Cassava Starch-Gelatin Composite Films. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2012, 61, 778–792. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLee, J.H.; Yi, G.S.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, D.J. Physicochemical Characterization of Porcine Bone-Derived Grafting Material and Comparison with Bovine Xenografts for Dental Applications. J. Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017, 47, 388–401. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNaguleswaran, S.; Li, J.; Vasanthan, T.; Bressler, D.; Hoover, R. Amylolysis of Large and Small Granules of Native Triticale, Wheat and Corn Starches Using a Mixture of -Amylase and Glucoamylase. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 864–874. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCano, A.; Jiménez, A.; Cháfer, M.; Gónzalez, C.; Chiralt, A. Effect of Amylose: Amylopectin Ratio and Rice Bran Addition on Starch Films Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 543–555. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBecerra, J.; Rodriguez, M.; Leal, D.; Noris-Suarez, K.; Gonzalez, G. Chitosan-Collagen-Hydroxyapatite Membranes for Tissue Engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2022, 33, 18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMosleh, Y.; de Zeeuw, W.; Nijemeisland, M.; Bijleveld, J.C.; van Duin, P.; Poulis, J.A. The Structure–Property Correlations in Dry Gelatin Adhesive Films. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2000716. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationValencia, G.A.; Luciano, C.G.; Lourenço, R.V.; Bittante, A.M.Q.B.; do Amaral Sobral, P.J. Morphological and Physical Properties of Nano-Biocomposite Films Based on Collagen Loaded with Laponite®. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 19, 24–30. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAndonegi, M.; Peñalba, M.; de la Caba, K.; Guerrero, P. ZnO Nanoparticle-Incorporated Native Collagen Films with Electro- Conductive Properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 110394. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationQamruzzaman, M.; Ahmed, F.; Mondal, M.I.H. An Overview on Starch-Based Sustainable Hydrogels: Potential Applications and Aspects. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 19–50. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAraújo, M.A.; Cunha, A.M.; Mota, M. Enzymatic Degradation of Starch-Based Thermoplastic Compounds Used in Protheses: Identification of the Degradation Products in Solution. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 2687–2693. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnderson, J.M.; Rodriguez, A.; Chang, D.T. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 86–100. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Putten, S.M.; Ploeger, D.T.A.; Popa, E.R.; Bank, R.A. Macrophage Phenotypes in the Collagen-Induced Foreign Body Reaction in Rats. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 6502–6510. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLuttikhuizen, D.T.; Harmsen, M.C.; Van Luyn, M.J.A. Cellular and Molecular Dynamics in the Foreign Body Reaction. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12, 1955–1970. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, W.; Li, Z. Porous Organosilicone Modified Gelatin Hybrids with Controllable and Homogeneous in Vitro Degradation Behaviors for Potential Application as Skin Regeneration Scaffold. Polym. Int. 2019, 68, 1411–1419. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOzeki, M.; Tabata, Y. In Vivo Degradability of Hydrogels Prepared from Different Gelatins by Various Cross-Linking Methods. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2005, 16, 549–561. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBlaine, G. Absorbable Gelatin Sponge in Experimental Surgery. Lancet 1951, 2, 427–429. [CrossRef]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCegielski, M.; Izykowska, I.; Podhorska-Okolow, M.; Zabel, M.; Dziegiel, P. Development of Foreign Body Giant Cells in Response to Implantation of Spongostan®as a Scaffold for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. In Vivo 2008, 22, 203–206. [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYe, Q.; Harmsen, M.C.; Ren, Y.; Bank, R.A. The Role of Collagen Receptors Endo180 and DDR-2 in the Foreign Body Reaction against Non-Crosslinked Collagen and Gelatin. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1339–1350. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSamperio, G.; Garay, C.; Guitrón, A.; Vega, J. Modelo Para La Valoración Cuantitativa de La Cicatrización. Estudio Piloto Con Miel de Abeja. Cir. Gen. 2015, 27, 114–119.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationValencia-Llano, C.H.; López-Tenorio, D.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. Biocompatibility Assessment of Two Commercial Bone Xenografts by In Vitro and In Vivo Methods. Polymers 2022, 14, 2672. [CrossRef]spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccespa
dc.audiencePúblico generalspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym14183849
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad del Atlánticospa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad del Atlánticospa
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.subject.keywordsbiocompatibilityspa
dc.subject.keywordsbiocompositespa
dc.subject.keywordscassava starchspa
dc.subject.keywordschicken gelatinspa
dc.subject.keywordscomposite membranesspa
dc.subject.keywordstissue engineeringspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftspa
dc.type.spaAnimaciónspa
dc.publisher.placeBarranquillaspa
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.sedeSede Nortespa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
polymers-14-03849-v2.pdf
Tamaño:
9.825Mb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/
Thumbnail
Nombre:
license_rdf
Tamaño:
914bytes
Formato:
application/rdf+xml
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ATLÁNTICO

Institución Pública de Educación Superior | Sujeta a la inspección y vigilancia del Ministerio de Educación Nacional | Nit. 890102257-3
Sede Norte: Carrera 30 Número 8- 49 Puerto Colombia - Atlántico | Sede Centro: Carrera 43 Número 50 - 53 Barranquilla- Atlántico.
Bellas Artes- Museo de Antropología: Calle 68 Número 53- 45 Barranquilla- Atlántico | Sede Regional Sur: Calle 7 No. 23-5 Barrio Abajo Suan- Atlántico
Línea de atención: PBX: (57) (5) 3852266 | Atlántico- Colombia | © Universidad del Atlántico
#UniversidadDeTodos

Resolución de lineamientos del repositorio - Estatuto de propiedad intelectual - Formato para trabajos de grado - Politicas Repositorio Institucional

Tecnología DSpace implementada por